What is before anything?

We are living in an era marked by science discoveries at a relatively fast speed, distance from the creator, lack of sexual boundaries.
No doubt internet has played a role, but like all things, this new tool test us again to regain composure and harness its power to the good.
What is the truth?
The truth is reality. So what is reality?

Reality is that no matter how past you go, you will find out that there must be a creator of everything.
Ask any expert scientist, and he will tell you that before the big bang, all are theories. More big bangs, a big bang soup, a never ending big bang big crash.
Our experience with this world, tells us that everything has a source. So even the big bang, big crush or the big bang generator has a source, a cause.
If there is not a cause for our universe and always was like this, then we wonder, why heterogenous?
Our again experience with the world, tell us, that it can not be that the universe is like this, in favour of other forms, just because is. There is a reason. So if has always been like this, there must be a reason why like this, and not other way. Our intuition, our pattern detector after experiencing the world, through scientific exploration and ordinary life, tell us that it just does not make sense that the universe is 3 dimensional without a reason, and always has been like this without a reason. And if there is a reason of the 3 dimensional universe, and this reason we assign into another physical generator like multidimensional universe generator, then where did this multidimensional universe generator came from?

The most logical think to think is that the beginning is like an homogenous infinite thing that created this universe, and can create all possible things.
Now. I myself did not realised about it but does this "thing" act randomly? Does it generate realities at random? Imagine we accept this infinite homogenous thing has always been there. It is the "all". So the "all" randomly generated us.
Imagine intelligence is just an stable state of this random generator. Ok and good.
What is wrong? What is wrong with this random generator? What is wrong with an homogenous infinity that simply randomly generated the universe?
What is indeed wrong, is that is too beautiful. Too coherent, to intelligent. If we not even enter into the unimaginable coherence and simplicity that the physical patterns have as shown by the study of its relations through the science of mathematics, just enter into how many times scientist tell us that had the physics had this or that constant far away, then the universe would be chaotic without almost any form. From the formation of atoms, to number of dimensions of the universe.
This random generator works on the premise of the notion that since we exist and think, then it must be that even if we are the most stable state in a random generator of existence, we determine that eventually, even if the probabilities are astoundingly close to 0, since only this combination made us to exist (among maybe other possible few combinations), only those existing are able to look at the event as a success. Meaning, every intelligent living form will find out that his existence is a probability rarity. But since exist, it is normal that all the odds where against. All those combinations that did not form life, can not appreciate that probability, because they do not exist. All this is the basis of existence posed by the Antrophic principle.
Why the universe is not a random existence generator?
Because if we study very closely, we will find that a random generator does not add up.
We can not judge before the big bang because we do not have data, but we can judge other levels.
It is known that randomly, it has not passed enough time on earth to create life. So most theories deduce that it came from outer space.
All right. The question is, is there from the creation of big bang, enough permutations to create life at random? Remember we can not use aliens, because they too must have an origin.
And now add that, already yet difficult task to create life at random, you must include the odds that: that random generated life must have been flying around in space; and ended up in our earth; and not died while reentering in the atmosphere; and had to land on the earth; in the exact period where life could be accommodated.

The odds just do not add up. Probabilities tell us that even if this universe or the big bang were generated randomly. The odds of starting life on earth judging by the age of the universe, the physical distances, and the difficulty of spreading one life generator spot to another is almost nonexistent (I think).

Remember that even if life happened randomly in our own milky way, that life had to somehow get out from its planet, and land at earth, being hitting earth like hitting probably a single grain of sand, shooting from the space, and only that grain of sand can accommodate life in the whole earth. It would be like having a milky way size target, and you must hit earth like worlds bullseye. The earth is already a single point compared to the sun, in the midst of space.

And now, when life has been created, how did a cell randomly learned to reproduce itself?
Does anybody can imagine how from carbon molecules combinations, there was one that randomly had a whole mechanism to reproduce itself? There is no middle stages. There is no half reproduction mechanism stage, since half mechanism does not do anything advantageous that makes that strucure more stable. Its parts alone are useless. You need it all, at once. No part gives any evolutive advantage to keep there for long, and become more complex.

Natural selection is based on the notion that random mutations or combinations in nature, get selected by the weather or else depending if they stay fit, or get destroyed. The ones that stay fit, add new combinations that makes them even more fit.

Now. The point is, that till reproduction, even the most fittest molecule eventually was destroyed. Its huge beautiful stable form could not last forever and, once destroyed, that rarity was never ever remembered until randomly it was generated again.

So here it comes, cellular reproduction. Reproduction maintains those exceptional fit carbon complex molecules structures and formations by reproducing them in big numbers. So now, even if they do not last forever, their fit random happening is remembered, and able to build upon a success story, instead of starting from 0 again.

Carbon molecules randomly generate a huge number of possible combinations, so eventually they can yield very new never saw before forms. Now, the point is that the artificial selection in the water, selected them if they survived instead of being crashed again into carbon and other atoms. I understand that complex forms with an impermeable wall could be made randomly, and be stronger than other complex molecules, so live longer and eventually be more common in the water than other forms.

We know that reproduction is a complex mechanism that involves many parts. Reproduction in itself only succeeds by reproducing the cell completely. If if reproduces it in a different form, then it is not fit, and that cell is destroyed naturally. The point is that there is no fitness advantage of any part of the reproduction, until you have all the mechanism, and its parts running, and then it copies the cell.
Said in another form. The odds of randomly appear a reproduction mechanism on carbon based molecules entirely in its beautiful form (remember evolution can not account for its parts, because they do not give per se any evolutionary advantage), are razoring 0.

There are more mechanisms in living forms that naturally evolved complexity from one step to the next, noting that none of its constituting parts gave any advantage. [1]

"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
--Charles Darwin, Origin of Species

Well Darwin. Your theory does break down.
But let's not go into scientific vendettas here nor science vs religion.
We simply point out that indeed there is not a random existence generator, simply because at some stages it is proved that there are not enough samples to say that we are naturally one of those random generated ones that happen to have life.
It is more like there are samples, and those samples are against all odds put there so that there is life.

So now, we go back. Our random generator of existence, is not random. But is intelligent. Because it could foresee that this exact combinations would give life, and not only life, but intelligent life.

Conclusion. There is an infinite intelligence thing, that created all things. And meant to create us. Explicitly.

Now what it is? What do we know about It? Or He? or She?

[1] http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/840